- Analyzing river sand from a remote region of Finland has now shown that Scandinaviaâs geological foundation was likely born in Greenland.
- The new data implies that Scandinavia is 250 million years older than originally thought.
- By tracing the chemical fingerprint of the Finnish river sand, researchers discovered that Scandinavia originally broke off Greenland.
A scientific study out of Copenhagen borrowed a script from a Maury Povich talk show, and now we know the real birthplace of Scandinavia . And it isnât what we thought.
Thanks to the chemical fingerprint of river sand and rock samples from a little-studied remote region of Finland, a team of researchers from the University of Copenhagen were able to show that not only is the Fennoscandian geological regionâwhich includes Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finlandâroughly 250 million years older than previously thought, but the entire region was born in Greenland.
âThe zircon crystals we found in river sand and rocks from Finland have signatures that point toward them being much older than anything ever found in Scandinavia, while matching the age of Greenlandic rock samples,â Andreas Petersson, researcher at the universityâs Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, said in a statement . At the same time, the results of three independent isotope analyses confirm that Scandinaviaâs bedrock can most likely be linked to Greenland.
By scouring the remote PudasjĂ€rvi and SuomujĂ€rvi regions of Finlandâan outcrop nestled between some of Northern Europeâs oldest mountainsâand analyzing the geochemistry tracers uranium-lead, lutetium-hafnium, the team was able to date the crystals and tie them to Greenlandâs crust. The researchers published their study in Geology , saying that the âfoundationâ on which Scandinavia rests was likely âbornâ from Greenland about 3.75 billion years ago. Thatâs 250 million years earlier than commonly believed.
The researchers believe that the Fennoscandian region broke away from Greenland as a âseed,â and shifted for hundreds of millions of years until it âtook rootâ where Finland is today. Then, the plate grew around it, amassing new geological material in the process and giving us modern-day Scandinavia.
The makeup of the world at the time would have made this feasible, the team claims. âEarth was probably a water planet, like in the movie Waterwold , but without any oxygen in the atmosphere and without emergent crust,â Tod Waight, geologist in the Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, said in a statement. âBut, because thatâs so far back in time, we canât really be sure about what it actually looked like.â
The researchers believe that understanding how continents formed may help us comprehend why Earth is the only planet in the Solar System with life. Even the fact that our continental crust includes granite is unique when compared to other planets. âEvidence of liquid water and a granite crust are key factors when trying to identify habitable exoplanets and the possibility of life beyond earth,â Petersson said.
The study also offers a fresh way of thinking about how the continents grew in early days. âThe most commonly used models assume that Earthâs continental crust began to form when the planet was formed, about 4.6 billion years ago,â Waight said. âInstead, our and several other recent studies suggest that the chemical signatures showing growth of the continental crust can only be identified about a billion years later. This means that we may need to revise much of what we thought about how early continents evolved.â
The team states that âseedsâ forming ancient crusts occurs across the world, and provides fresh clues each time.
âBut there is still plenty that we donât know,â Waight said. âIn Australia , South Africa, and India, for example, similar seeds have been found, but weâre unsure of whether they all come from the same birthplace, or whether they originated independently of one another in several places on Earth.â
Get the continental paternity tests ready.
